Research transparency · Updated July 23, 2026

Sources and Source Standards

We prioritise primary product documents and authoritative public-health information, then use secondary and consumer sources carefully and with clear limits.

Last reviewed July 23, 2026

Source hierarchy

Which Sources Carry the Most Weight?

Tier 1

Primary Product Materials

Product labels, official product pages, checkout pages, terms of service, shipping policies and refund policies. These are used to establish what is listed, advertised or contractually stated.

Tier 2

Regulatory and Health Sources

Government agencies and recognised public-health organisations. These provide general context on supplements, ingredients, safety and evidence standards.

Tier 3

Business and Consumer Records

Public complaint profiles and consumer-protection records may help identify service or fulfilment themes. They are not proof that every customer will have the same experience.

Tier 4

Secondary Explanations

Reputable educational summaries may be used for background when primary material is unavailable, but they are not allowed to override stronger direct sources.

MemoGenesis source set

Sources Used for the Main Guide

MemoGenesis official product and checkout pages, accessed July 21, 2026
MemoGenesis official terms of service, refund policy and shipping policy pages
Public product label information supplied or displayed with the product materials
Better Business Bureau public complaint profile for consumer-service context
U.S. Food and Drug Administration dietary supplement guidance for regulatory context
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health ingredient information for general health context

Source list last reviewed July 23, 2026

How sources are used

Matching the Source to the Claim

Label facts are supported by the product label or equivalent primary material.
Price and package facts are supported by dated sales or checkout materials.
Refund and shipping facts are supported by current policy or terms pages.
General ingredient context is based on authoritative health information, not on seller copy alone.
Consumer experience themes are identified as anecdotal and are not presented as clinical evidence.

Source limitations

What Public Sources May Not Reveal

Public materials may not provide access to private manufacturing records, batch testing, internal quality-control reports, customer-account data or unpublished clinical studies. We do not claim to have reviewed documents that were not available to us.

Absence of public evidence is not proof of absence. It means only that the specific evidence was not identified in the public materials reviewed.

Weak source types

What We Do Not Treat as Conclusive

Anonymous promotional websites that repeat seller claims without showing a source.
Testimonials, star ratings or social posts used as proof that a supplement works.
Research on a different formula presented as proof for MemoGenesis.
Undated price claims or screenshots that cannot be connected to a current page.
AI-generated summaries used without checking the underlying source.

Source updates

Reporting an Outdated or Missing Source

Use the contact page to report a broken source, newer policy page or material factual conflict. Include the page URL and the source you believe should be reviewed.

Transparency centre

How We Work

About UsWho we are, what we cover and how this website is funded. Editorial PolicyThe rules we follow when writing, updating and correcting content. Review MethodologyThe practical checks used to assess product claims, pricing, safety and terms. SourcesThe source types we prioritise and the limits of the available information.